Basically, if you want to measure it you take off the springs and move the car up and down and measure toe every inch and plot it. As far as bump steer, Porsche is pretty well designed and there isn’t much, but if you mess with the roll center you need to move the tie rods by close to the same about or you will get bumpsteer. The balance of the car is ok but there is a minor pitch issue I think is frequency related so I want to go softer spring wise in the front and up in the front bar. I want to go down to 10 kg and KW is backordered. We are waiting for softer front springs right now. I may be working with a well-known Porsche suspension parts company next year to develop my own solution to these issues on the 987 chassis which if it comes to fruition will be much better than this! At least in my own opinion. The Cayman/Boxter chassis has wheel hop as a known issue and they exhibit a high degree of anti. Lastly, the anti-squat percentage is really high and that can contribute to a loss of traction under corner exit as well as wheel hop.

The short links will also cause side scrub which can contribute to instability on split mu surfaces and under certain load conditions. The short links can also contribute to jacking and lots of roll center and instant center migration.

My opinion of this kit is that the upper links are way too short and you will have too much camber gain for rear-driven wheels. I would be careful and run a battery tender that is for lithum batteries only! A well-known friend of ours blew up his car and almost burned down his shop because he used the wrong trickle charger!

987 strut bar